Direct access to the Delta login nodes is via ssh using your NCSA username, password and NCS Duo MFA. Please see NCSA Allocation and Account Management page for links to NCSA Identity and NCSA Duo services. The login nodes provide access to the CPU and GPU resources on Delta.
Access Password Unlocker v3.0.1.0 Software Crack
Please see NCSA Allocation and Account Management for the steps to change your NCSA password for direct access and set up NCSA DUO. Please contact help@ncsa.illinois.edu for assistance if you do not know your NCSA username.
How long it takes to crack the database depends heavily on how many transformation rounds you put your key through, and how complex your password is. For example, if you put your key through enough rounds that it takes 1 second to generate on your computer, then you should be able to test one password per second on your computer alone. A faster computer, or multiple computers in parallel will be able to generate the keys faster. A parallel attack is not implemented in the cracker, but one can be setup by hand.
The cracker is a console application. It takes as arguments a single KeePass 2 database file, one or more wordlist files, and the number of threads to use. It can use STDIN as the wordlist source, so John the Ripper or another program can feed candidate passwords into it. It is built on the .NET framework, and uses KeePass's native dll's to perform the key generation. The cracker may be able to be optimized further.
Additional information:I created it to help crack one of my own databases for which I lost part of the password, thus it does not currently support databases encrypted with key files or Windows user accounts, but they wouldn't be too hard to implement.
I am trying to wrap my head around the length f time it would take to crack the keepass db. Assuming that I have a 20 character password or passphrase that potentially uses any character on the keyboard and assuming that you can guess at a rate of 345 passwords per second. How long would it take on average to crack the db?
There is an interactive webpage at Gibson Research (GRC) that attempts to answer your question of how long a password guessing routine would take to crack a password of a specified length and complexity under various brute force cracking scenarios. You may find it interesting.
According to my estimates, if you use the default KeePass settings and the whole world devoted all of its computational power to crack your password, it could actually be cracked with certainty by 2085. This assumes they know your password length and complexity, which you just posted. It is more likely AES or SHA-3 will be broken before then, or the advent of quantum computers makes 256-bit encryption weak. I estimate a ten-trillionth of a percent chance your password could be cracked by 2030 in the whole-world-against-you scenario. You could probably reduce your password complexity quite a bit and still be reasonably safe from the whole world until our algorithm is broken. Though, if the whole world wanted your password, you should probably just give it to them. These estimates are based on indeterminate data and could be affected by optimizations in the cracker, unforeseen advents in technology, or errors in my formula, data, or calculations.
I think you might also agree, based on your subsequent posts, that your utility is designed to exploit weakness of a given password not weakness of the KeePass encryption method. If so, your utility is more accurately described as a flexible batch password cracker/guesser for KeePass (where the user provides the password candidates in a list).
That's hardly necessary. Like I said, once our algorithm is broken, it won't really matter what your password is, and that's at least a quadrillion times more likely to happen than a password like yours being cracked. Changing your password also does not protect previous versions of your database.
Thank you, I was hoping someone would post other implementations in this thread. Unfortunately, that script can only crack KeePass 1.x databases, and NOT KeePass 2 databases. It attaches to KeePass 1.7 as a debugger, changes the password in memory, and forces KeePass to retry opening the database. Therefore, it requires exactly KeePass 1.7 to be installed, requires the full overhead of KeePass, is not optimized, and has little room for optimizations.
so this is a version of firmware [Version:0.1.0 0.9.1 v5006.0 Build 200304 Rel.64006n] which if you flash to any V2 device will give you access to the Telephony (VOIP) and other menus CWMP etc [ =sharing ]so you should have a fully functional device note the superuser password is not known for this version but is not required to access the menus just login as admin admin
Arguably, all of this crap is backdoored to hell by agencies with acronyms so it was never really safe to start off with. But yeah, sharing passwords across multiple bits of CPE means that once 1 customer is compromised, then all of them are. I liked it better when you could buy something (software or hardware) and you owned it, so nothing changed unless you made the change. vendors pushing out updates is the bane of my existance.
If you set a backup email address then confirmation emails will also be sent to this address. This is useful if the user password grants access to the user's primary mailbox. So passwords can be unlocked with an external email address.
This special page allows your deskside support staff to reset the Unix and Samba passwords of your users. Account may also be (un)locked If you set the access level to "Change passwords" then LAM will not allow any changes to the LDAP database except password changes via this page. The account pages will be still available in read-only mode.
Next, please enter the DN and password of an LDAP entry that is allowed to reset the passwords. This entry needs write access to the attributes shadowLastChange, pwdAccountLockedTime and userPassword. It also needs read access to uid, mail, passwordSelfResetQuestion and passwordSelfResetAnswer. Please note that LAM Pro saves the password on your server file system. Therefore, it is required to protect your server against unauthorised access.
There is also an option to skip the security question at all if email verification is enabled. In this case the password can be reset directly after clicking on the confirmation link. Please handle with care since anybody with access to the user's mail account can reset the password.
If your server is chrooted and you have no access to /dev/random or /dev/urandom this can be a security risk. LAM stores your LDAP password encrypted in the session. LAM uses rand() to generate the key if /dev/random and /dev/urandom are not accessible. Therefore the key can be easily guessed. An attaker needs read access to the session file (e.g. by another Apache instance) to exploit this.
With HTTP authentication Apache will be responsible to ask for the user name and password. Both will then be forwarded to LAM which will use it to access LDAP. This approach gives you more flexibility to restrict the number of users that may access LAM (e.g. by requiring group memberships).
The one and only feature I have prayed for was an easy way to split tunnel various apps to like torrent software access the vpn while at same time I could access my LAN from thunar or nautlus, etcif i remeber correct i think ssh with filezilla is particulry problematic with lan shares on left side and remote shares on right side.i love linux mint but the tradional way of putting everything to vpn just didnt work.Will this function be fixed like windows 10 is so out of the box easy with ivacy. 2ff7e9595c
留言